News

CMHNetwork is bringing both sides of the AOT discussion together for conversation with congressional staff

July 23, 2014

Last week, Martin Rafferty, CMHNetwork Advisory Council member and Executive Director, Youth M.O.V.E. Oregon, joined me in meetings with staff from the offices of Representative Murphy (PA) and Representative Barber (AZ). The purpose of our visit was to continue our ongoing discussion about the efforts of members of Congress who are looking for areas of compromise between two mental health bills (HR 3717 and HR 4574) currently in committee.

  • Right up front I want to give a hearty thank you to the staff from both offices for their willingness to continue to meet with representatives from the Children’s Mental Health Network. We know your schedules are incredibly busy, and we value not only the time you continue to give us, but your willingness to listen.
  • The back of the business card message from us during our visit was “Don’t give up and don’t shy away from the hard stuff!”

We stressed the importance of dealing with some of the most contentious issues in both bills and not just settling for moving forward the non-controversial ones. There has been so much discussion this past year about the state of the mental health delivery system in America; it would be a shame to take the easy way out and put forward a bill with no teeth in it to address the growing perception of a broken mental health delivery system.

The area of focus for this particular visit was primarily on the provision in HR 3717 that requires states to authorize assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) in order to receive Community Mental Health Service Block Grant funds. The Network has posted several articles from Network faithful both for and against the Assisted Outpatient Treatment provision in the Murphy bill. Like so many things in life, the issue is much more complicated than just a yes or no answer, especially for young adult children who may be living at home with their parents.

In a recent Morning Zen post, I spoke of the “inconvenient truth” that some families face when their adult children are in a dangerous place, and they are struggling with how or if to be involved in treatment decisions. The issue is real, and passions are high for and against. Since the Network has faithful followers and contributors to Morning Zen representing both sides of the discussion, it is incumbent upon us to look for areas of agreement and compromise to help move the discussion forward.

To further drive home how serious we are about modeling rational discussion and expanded understanding of differing positions, we invited both Representatives and their staff to observe a conversation between a small group of dedicated advocates from differing perspectives on the use of Assisted Outpatient Treatment. The purpose of the meeting is not to come up with an “answer” or decision on which approach is better, but simply to create an environment of civil discussion and maybe a bit more insight among participants about the perspective of others.

When we described the structure of the meeting to both offices, each were equally encouraging of such a dialogue, and while no firm commitments were made on who from each office would attend, we were encouraged enough that we are moving forward with the meeting. Representative Barber’s office has agreed to help us secure space for the meeting, and we are looking at dates in August.

We have identified a small group of individuals representing a variety of perspectives on the issue of Assisted Outpatient Treatment. All have written Morning Zen posts for the Children’s Mental Health Network or are Advisory Council members actively involved in the discussion of the issue. Participant names are hyperlinked to their Morning Zen posts.

So far, we have the following commitments to travel to Washington, DC for this meeting:

As always with the Network, everyone pays their own way, and we appreciate the commitment and sacrifice these wonderful advocates are willing to make for this effort.

Here is the structure of the meeting, which is actually quite simple. Just the way we like it!

  • The small group will convene to discuss perspective and experience with Assisted Outpatient Treatment.
  • No charts, graphs, research studies allowed! There have been presentations of research on both sides of the issue presented in many different forums. And it seems to us that neither side is listening to the other, so we are gonna leave the PowerPoints behind!
  • Legislators and legislative staff will be invited to observe the discussion.
  • At the end of the discussion, we will open it up to questions or comments from legislators and legislative staff. We are not asking for any commitment or public statement from legislators and their staff at this meeting. Square one folks. It’s time advocates model the practice that they preach. 
  • The goal of the discussion is not to “solve” anything – just to broaden understanding of the unique perspective each brings to the topic. Quite bluntly, our goal in this meeting is not to convince members in Congress of what the “right decision” is, but more to encourage continued and more frequent dialogue between proponents of both bills. Knowledge is power. Ignorance is bliss, which is always short lived. 

Pretty darned simple and basic. This meeting is not designed to move the earth. It is simply designed to get people with different perspectives in the same room for a calm and rational discussion – something that we have not seen evidence of to date.

We will keep Network faithful posted as the meeting takes shape. To borrow a phrase from the Moral Monday movement in North Carolina, “One step forward, not one step back.”

scott

Scott Bryant-Comstock
President & CEO
Children’s Mental Health Network
 

 

Explore More Posts

What Do You Think?

Join The Conversation